Efektivitas Upaya Hukum Kasasi Dalam Sengketa Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Pada Kasus Kecelakaan Lalu Lintas Yang Menimbulkan Kerugian Materiil

• Anderson Chandra Yauwira

  Author

• Yuni Priskila Ginting

  Author

• Shannon Gabriela Irene Halim

  Author

• Rianingsi A Pansariang

  Author

• Nasywa Nasyifa Dyfa

  Author

• M. Malikul Abdul A. M

  Author

• Lovresia Melati Siagian

  Author

• Fidelya Heryxlim Eng

  Author

• Ergia Novriliza

  Author

• Christian Indra Darmawan

  Author

• Zara Siti Erfira

  Author

This study examines the effectiveness of the cassation mechanism in civil disputes arising from traffic accidents that result in material losses, with a particular focus on the Supreme Court Decision No. 2775 K/Pdt/2018. As a form of extraordinary legal remedy, cassation plays a crucial role in ensuring the proper application of legal norms by lower courts. Using a normative juridical approach supported by limited empirical context, this research analyses whether the Supreme Court, acting as a judex juris, has exercised its authority in accordance with Article 30 of the Supreme Court Law. The findings show that the Supreme Court consistently limits its examination to legal reasoning, reaffirming that factual assessment such as determining negligence, evaluating evidence, and calculating material damages remains within the competence of judex facti. The Court confirmed that negligence had been correctly assessed based on Article 1365 of the Civil Code and Article 234 of the Traffic and Road Transportation Law. Furthermore, the causal relationship between the act and the loss was evaluated using the doctrine of adequate causality, while compensation was calculated according to the principle of actual loss supported by valid evidence. The study concludes that cassation is effective in maintaining legal certainty, ensuring consistency in the application of civil liability principles, and strengthening the integrity of the judicial system in traffic accident disputes.

Assembly, U. N. G. “Resolution 74/299: Improving Global Road Safety,” 2020. https://www.un.org/en/ga/74/resolutions.shtml%0D.

HADIYANTO, S. “EFEKTIFITAS KEADILAN RESTORATIF DALAM PENYELESAIAN KASUS KECELAKAAN LALU LINTAS (STUDI KASUS PADA KEJAKSAAN NEGERI SURABAYA).” Universitas Islam Sultan Agung Semarang, 2024.

Harahap, R. Anggung Jawab Hukum Dalam Kecelakaan Lalu Lintas: Perspektif Strict Liability Dan Perkembangannya Di Indonesia. Sinar Grafika, 2022.

Lembaga Bantuan Hukum (LBH) Masyarakat. Keadilan Jalanan: Studi Kasus Ketimpangan Tuntutan Ganti Rugi Kecelakaan Lalu Lintas Di Indonesia. LBH Masyarakat, 2023.

Mahadi, M. “Hambatan Tuntutan Ganti Rugi Dalam Kasus Kecelakaan Lalu Lintas Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Hukum Dan Pembangunan 53, no. 1 (2023): 102–119.

Nurhaliza, A. S. “Penilaian Kompensasi Terhadap Korban Kecelakaan Lalu Lintas Di Indonesia: Pendekatan Multidimensi.” Jurnal Sosial Dan Hukum 12, no. 2 (2024): 189–207.

Pratiwi, E. D. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Korban Kecelakaan Lalu Lintas Dalam Sistem Peradilan Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Hukum Responsif 9, no. 1 (2021): 45–59.

Rangotwat, C. A., SH, M., Flora, H. S., Sofian Syaiful Rizal, M. H., Nst, E. N., Nuroni, A. M., ... & Rohmawati, S. P. Perbandingan Hukum Perdata Dan Pidana Dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia. Cendikia Mulia Mandiri, 2025.

Teguh Prasetyo. Hukum Perdata Indonesia. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo, 2010.

Warsito, L. “Ganti Kerugian Akibat Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Dalam Kecelakaan Lalu Lintas.” Universitas Islam Indonesia, 2009.

Wiranti, Y. “Penerapan Gugatan Sederhana Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah.” Hukum Islam 20, no. 2 (2021): 151–66.

• pdf