CRIMINAL LIABILITY OF ONLINE LOAN JOCKEY SERVICE PROVIDERS: A LEGAL ANALYSIS UNDER INDONESIAN POSITIVE LAW

Authors
  • Muhammad Iqbal Dharmawan

    Universitas Airlangga
    Author
Keywords:
Criminal liability, online loan jockey, fintech, cybercrime, Indonesian law
Abstract

Online loan jockeys represent individuals or groups offering services to apply for loans using another person's identity, falsified identity, or fictitious identity. In practice, online loan jockeys cause losses not only to fintech lending companies but also to individuals whose personal data are stolen or misused. Therefore, legal accountability is required. This study examines the forms of criminal acts committed by online loan jockeys under Indonesian positive law and analyzes the criminal liability framework applicable to these service providers. The research employs normative legal methodology, utilizing statutory, case, and conceptual approaches. Findings reveal that online loan jockey conduct fulfills several criminal elements simultaneously: falsification of documents, fraudulent acts, unlawful manipulation of electronic information, and violations of personal data protection norms. Based on juridical analysis, online loan jockeys may be charged under Article 263 of the Indonesian Criminal Code (KUHP) for document forgery, Article 378 KUHP for fraud, Article 35 in conjunction with Article 51 of the Electronic Information and Transactions Law (ITE Law) for electronic data manipulation, and criminal provisions under the Personal Data Protection Law (PDP Law). The criminal act of online loan jockeying is multidimensional in nature, involving forgery, fraud, and cybercrime in an integrated manner. Criminal liability may be imposed cumulatively on the basis of concursus idealis (ideal concurrence), thereby creating a deterrent effect and ensuring maximum legal protection for the public.

References

Books

Arief, B. N. (2016). Masalah Penegakan Hukum dan Kebijakan Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Kencana.

Arif, M. S. (2018). Cybercrime: Tindak Pidana Dunia Maya. Malang: Setara Press.

Hamzah, A. (2008). Delik-Delik dalam KUHP. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Lamintang. (1997). Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.

Marzuki, P. M. (2021). Penelitian Hukum (15th ed.). Jakarta: Kencana.

Moeljatno. (2002). Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana. Yogyakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Soesilo, R. (1996). Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) serta Komentar-Komentarnya. Jakarta: Politeia.

Wahid, A., & Labib, M. (2010). Kejahatan Siber. Bandung: Refika Aditama.

Yudha, A. T. R. C. (2020). Fintech Syariah: Teori dan Terapan. Scopindo Media Pustaka.

Journal Articles

Damanik, E. S. (2022). Penegakan Hukum Nomor 77 Tahun 2016 Tentang Layanan Pinjam Meminjam Uang Berbasis Teknologi Informasi Terhadap Perlindungan Konsumen. Maleo Law Journal, 6(2), 151-165.

Dzaky, A. R. A., Kamal, M., & Badaru, B. (2024). Efektivitas Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Korban Melalui Aplikasi Pinjaman Online Ilegal Yang Terjadi Di Masyarakat. Journal of Lex Theory (JLT), 5(2), 711-729.

Maky, A. S., et al. (2023). Edukasi Resiko Pinjaman Online Dan Pencegahannya Dalam Perlindungan Hukum Di Desa Ciracas Kecamatan Kiarapedes Kabupaten Purwakarta. Abdi Laksana: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 844-845.

Purwanto, H., Yandri, D., & Yoga, M. P. (2022). Perkembangan dan dampak financial technology (fintech) terhadap perilaku manajemen keuangan di masyarakat. Ejurnal Swadharma, 11(1), 1-15.

Rafli, M. (2024). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Terhadap Penyalahgunaan Data Pribadi Dalam Layanan Aplikasi Pinjaman Online. Nova Juris Jurnal Hukum, 1(2), 28-52.

Sintadewi, S. H., et al. (2024). Inovasi Akuntansi Mudharabah Untuk Pembiayaan Berbasis Teknologi Dalam Ekosistem Fintech Syariah. Jurnal Musytari, 10(8), 101-115.

Wijayanti, S. (2022). Dampak Aplikasi Pinjaman Online Terhadap Kebutuhan Dan Gaya Hidup Konsumtif Buruh Pabrik. MIZANIA: Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Akuntansi, 230-245.

Yunianto, W. A., Astutik, S., & Handayati, N. (2025). Analisis Yuridis terhadap Tindak Pidana yang Dilakukan oleh Penyedia Aplikasi Pinjaman Online. Indonesia Journal of Business Law, 52-68.

Legislation

Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia 1945

Indonesian Criminal Code (KUHP)

Law Number 1 of 2023 concerning the Criminal Code

Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions

Law Number 27 of 2022 concerning Personal Data Protection

Financial Services Authority Regulation Number 77/POJK.01/2016 concerning Information Technology-Based Money Lending Services

Bank Indonesia Regulation Number 19/12/PBI/2017 concerning Financial Technology Implementation

Cover Image
Downloads
Published
2026-01-22
Section
Articles

How to Cite

CRIMINAL LIABILITY OF ONLINE LOAN JOCKEY SERVICE PROVIDERS: A LEGAL ANALYSIS UNDER INDONESIAN POSITIVE LAW. (2026). Causa: Jurnal Hukum Dan Kewarganegaraan, 16(3), 1591-1600. https://cibjournal.com/index.php/causa/article/view/7024

Similar Articles

41-50 of 306

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.