Evolusi Teori Kecurangan Menuju Fraud Heptagon: Implikasi bagi Pencegahan Laporan Keuangan Curang
Published 2025-12-14
Keywords
- Fraud Heptagon,
- Cultural and Religious Dimensions,
- Financial Reporting Fraud,
- Emerging Fraud Dimensions
How to Cite
Abstract
This study aims to detect the possibility of fraud in financial statements using the fraud heptagon developed by Reskino (2022). The fraud heptagon theory has seven dimensions: pressure, opportunity, rationalization, competence, arrogance, culture, and religiosity. The method used in this study was a Systematic Literature Review (SLR), which examined previous research on financial statement fraud and the fraud heptagon. The data used was second-hand data. Data analysis in this study involved mapping 28 selected journals from 2020 to 2025 in the Google Scholar database. The results of the study revealed factors influencing financial statement fraud, divided into seven indicators: pressure, opportunity, rationalization, competence, cultural arrogance, and religion. These were then analyzed using several proxies using qualitative research. Twenty factors were identified that had both positive and negative effects on financial statement fraud reports. These findings also answer the research question of whether arrogance, culture, and religiosity significantly influence the detection of fraudulent financial statements.
Downloads
References
- Adib, N., Rahma, M., & Widya, A. (2024). Financial reporting in the perception of heptagon fraud theory.
- Afrizal, R. (2022). Pengaruh Fraud Heptagon Terhadap Timbulnya Fraudulent Financial Statement Dengan Earnings Management Sebagai Variabel Intervening (Bachelor’s thesis, FEB UIN Jakarta).
- Azizah, S. (2023). Pendeteksian Fraudulent Financial Statement Melalui Teori Fraud Heptagon dalam Persepsi Auditor (Studi pada Auditor di Wilayah DKI Jakarta) (Bachelor’s thesis, Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis UIN Jakarta).
- Azizah, S., & Reskino, R. (2023). Pendeteksian fraudulent financial statement: Pengujian fraud heptagon theory. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Governance, 4(1), 17–37.
- Bagaskara, F. F. (2025). Analisis faktor-faktor yang memengaruhi fraud pada proses procurement menggunakan fraud heptagon theory (Thesis).
- Christian, N., Tryany, J., & Liang, V. L. (2024). Analisis motivasi fraud dengan pendekatan teori fraud. JSMA (Jurnal Sains Manajemen dan Akuntansi), 16(1), 77–95.
- Damarjati, R. G., & Yulianti, R. (2025). Pengaruh penerapan heptagon fraud theory terhadap kecurangan laporan keuangan. Jurnal Literasi Akuntansi, 5(2), 55–73.
- Fitrianes, I. (2025). Pengaruh Fraud Heptagon Terhadap Fraudulent Financial Reporting Dengan Model Beneish M-Score Dengan Good Corporate Governance Sebagai Variabel Moderasi.
- Handayani, D., & Kusumawardhani, I. (2025). Fraud heptagon in detecting fraudulent financial reporting using the method of Beneish M-Score. Jurnal Informasi, Perpajakan, Akuntansi, dan Keuangan Publik, 20(2), 337–364.
- Handoko, B. L., Putri, R. N. A., & Wijaya, S. (2022). Analysis of fraudulent financial reporting based on fraud heptagon model in transportation and logistic industry listed on IDX during Covid-19 pandemic. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Software and e-Business (pp. 56–63).
- Hidayat, R. (2023). Pengaruh Fraud Heptagon Model dalam Mendeteksi Fraudulent Financial Statement Dengan Income Tax Rate Sebagai Variabel Moderasi (Bachelor’s thesis, FEB UIN Jakarta).
- Murtadha, L. (2022). Pengembangan teorema menelaus dan transversal menelaus pada heptagon (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau).
- Pamungkas, I. D., & Irwandi, S. A. (2024). Detecting fraudulent financial reporting: Heptagon fraud model. The Indonesian Accounting Review, 14(2), 153–174.
- Permatasari, D. (2021). Fraud Pentagon sebagai alat pendeteksi financial statement fraud: Literatur review (Doctoral dissertation, Syiah Kuala University).
- Prayogi, G. D. (2023). Pengaruh fraud heptagon terhadap tingkat fraud dalam pengelolaan keuangan daerah: Peran whistleblowing system di DPPKAD Jawa Timur. Behavioral Accounting Journal, 6(2), 1–16.
- Prayogi, G. D., & Kurniawan, W. O. (2025). The influence of the fraud heptagon on fraud levels in Indonesian state-owned enterprises: The moderating role of the whistleblowing system. Majalah Ekonomi, 31(1), 49–59.
- Salmita, D. (2025). Determinan deteksi kecurangan keuangan: Fraud heptagon dalam persepsi auditor eksternal dan internal. Jurnal Akuntansi Manado (JAIM), 99–102.
- Serly, S., & Viviany, V. (2025). Fraud heptagon dan religiusitas terhadap kecurangan organisasi. Gorontalo Accounting Journal, 8(2), 283–298.
- Sihombing, T., & Cahyadi, C. C. (2021). The effect of fraud diamond on fraudulent financial statement in Asia Pacific companies. Ultimaccounting: Jurnal Ilmu Akuntansi, 13(1), 143–155. https://doi.org/10.31937/akuntansi.v13i1.2031
- Sopia, L. (2023). Pengaruh Heptagon Fraud terhadap Fraudulent Financial Statement Dengan Audit Quality Sebagai Variabel Intervening (Bachelor’s thesis, FEB UIN Jakarta).
- Thamlim, W., & Reskino, R. (2023). Fraudulent financial reporting with fraud pentagon perspective: The role of corporate governance as moderator. American Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Research, 7(1), 18–38.
- Urumsah, D., Wicaksono, A. P., & Hardinto, W. (2018). Pentingkah nilai religiusitas dan budaya organisasi untuk mengurangi kecurangan? Jurnal Akuntansi Multiparadigma, 9(1), 156–172.
- Utama, M. R. P. (2024). Analyzing fraud detection of financial statements using fraud heptagon model: A case study in non-financial corporates in Indonesia (Doctoral dissertation, Sriwijaya University).
- Wolfe, D. T., & Hermanson, D. R. (2004). The fraud diamond: Considering the four elements of fraud. The CPA Journal.