MISKONSEPSI DALAM PEMBELAJARAN FISIKA, TOPIK, DIAGNOSIS, DAN REMEDIASI: ANALISIS BIBLIOMETRIK DAN SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW

• Munzilatur Rohmah

  Universitas Negeri Surabaya

  Author

• Setyo Admoko

  Universitas Negeri Surabaya

  Author

Penelitian ini bertujuan mendeskripsikan miskonsepsi pada pembelajaran fisika dan menunjukkan kontribusi Indonesia dalam penelitian miskonsepsi berdasarkan database Scopus. Metode yang digunakan adalah analisis bibliometrik dengan VOSviewer dan tinjauan literatur sistematis. Visualisasi dengan kata kunci "physics misconception" dan "physics alternative concept" menunjukkan terdapat empat klaster utama dalam penelitian ini. Institusi dengan jumlah publikasi terbanyak didominasi oleh perguruan tinggi di Indonesia, meskipun Amerika Serikat merupakan negara yang paling banyak berkontribusi dalam penelitian. Penulis top dalam penelitian belum tentu masuk dalam top sitasi, Clement adalah salah satu peneliti yang masuk dalam keduanya. Tren penelitian ini bergerak dari miskonsepsi secara umum hingga remediasi miskonsepsi yang efektif. Berdasarkan hasil analisis bibliometrik, topik miskonsepsi yang paling banyak diteliti adalah mekanika, instrumen diagnosis yang paling sering digunakan berupa tes pilihan ganda (multiple choice), serta metode remediasi yang dominan diterapkan adalah conceptual change text.

This research aims to describe misconceptions in physics learning and show Indonesia's contribution to research on misconceptions based on the Scopus database. The method used is bibliometric analysis with VOSviewer and systematic literature observation. Visualization with the keywords "physics misconceptions" and "alternative concepts of physics" shows that there are four main clusters in this research. The institutions with the highest number of publications are dominated by universities in Indonesia, although the United States is the country that contributes the most research. Top authors in research do not necessarily go to top sites, Clement is one of the researchers who goes to both. This research trend moves from general misconceptions to effective misconception remediation. Based on the bibliometric analysis, the most frequently studied misconception topic is mechanics, the most commonly used diagnostic instrument is multiple-choice tests, and the most frequently applied remediation method is conceptual change text.

Addey, C., & Sellar, S. (2017). Forum paper : The rise of international large-scale assessments ( ILSAs ) and rationales for participation Camilla Addey , Sam Sellar , Gita Steiner-Khamsi , Bob Lingard and Antoni Verger. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 47, 434–452.

Aisahsari, R., & Ermawati, F. U. (2020). Evaluating Student’s Misconceptions and the Causes on Direct Current Concepts by Means of Four-Tier Multiple Choice Test. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1491(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1491/1/012009

Allen, M. (2019). Misconceptions in Primary Science 3rd Edition (3 edition). McGraw-Hill Education.

Çelikkanlı, N. Ö., & Kızılcık, H. Ş. (2022). A Review of Studies About Four-Tier Diagnostic Tests in Physics Education. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 19(4), 1291–1311. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2022.175

Chernikova, O., Heitzmann, N., Stadler, M., Holzberger, D., Seidel, T., & Fischer, F. (2020). Simulation-based learning in higher education: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 90(4), 499–541.

Chung, J. S. (2022). Analysis of Physics Contents in 10th-grade Science Textbooks of the 2015 National Curriculum. New Physics: Sae Mulli, 72(2), 119–124. https://doi.org/10.3938/NPSM.72.119

Clement, J. (1982). Students’ preconceptions in introductory mechanics. American Journal of Physics, 50(1), 66–71.

Clement, J., Brown, D. E., & Zietsman, A. (1989). Not all preconceptions are misconceptions: Finding ‘anchoring conceptions’ for grounding instruction on students’ intuitions. International Journal of Science Education, 11(5), 554–565. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069890110507

Engelhardt, P. V., & Beichner, R. J. (2004). Students’ understanding of direct current resistive electrical circuits. American Journal of Physics, 72(1), 98–115.

Falloon, G. (2019). Using simulations to teach young students science concepts: An Experiential Learning theoretical analysis. Computers & Education, 135, 138–159.

Fernández del Amo, I., Erkoyuncu, J. A., Roy, R., Palmarini, R., & Onoufriou, D. (2018). A systematic review of Augmented Reality content-related techniques for knowledge transfer in maintenance applications. Computers in Industry, 103, 47–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2018.08.007

Gholam, A. P. (2019). Inquiry-based learning: Student teachers’ challenges and perceptions. Journal of Inquiry and Action in Education, 10(2), 6.

Gusmalini, A., Wulandari, S., & Zulfarina. (2020). Identification of Misconceptions and Causes of Student Misconceptions on Genetics Concept with CRI Method. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1655(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1655/1/012053

Halim, A., Lestari, D., & Mustafa. (2019). Identification of the causes of misconception on the concept of dynamic electricity. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1280(5), 0–6. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1280/5/052060

Hammer, D. (1996a). Misconceptions or p-prims: How may alternative perspectives of cognitive structure influence instructional perceptions and intentions. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 5(2), 97–127.

Hammer, D. (1996b). More than misconceptions: Multiple perspectives on student knowledge and reasoning, and an appropriate role for education research. American Journal of Physics, 64(10), 1316–1325.

Hammer, D. (2000). Student resources for learning introductory physics. American Journal of Physics, 68(S1), S52–S59.

Hermanto, I. M., Nurhayati, Tahir, I., & Yunus, M. (2023). Penerapan Model Guided Context-and Problem-Based Learning Untuk Meningkatkan Pemahaman Konsep Pada Materi Gelombang Bunyi. JPF (Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika) Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar, 11(1), 151–162. https://doi.org/10.24252/jpf.v11i1.36233

Hidaayatullaah, H. N., Suprapto, N., Hariyono, E., Prahani, B. K., & Wulandari, D. (2021). Research trends on ethnoscience based learning through bibliometric analysis: Contributed to physics learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2110(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2110/1/012026

Irmak, M., Inaltun, H., Ercan-Dursun, J., Yaniş-Kelleci, H., & Yürük, N. (2023). Development and application of a three-tier diagnostic test to assess pre-service science teachers’ understanding on work-power and energy concepts. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 21(1), 159–185.

Isra, R. A., & Mufit, F. (2023). Students’ conceptual understanding and causes of misconceptions on Newton’s Law. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 12(4), 1914–1924. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v12i4.25568

Jatmiko, B., Prahani, B. K., Suprapto, N., Admoko, S., Deta, U. A., Lestari, N. A., Jauhariyah, M. N. R., Yantidewi, M., & Muliyati, D. (2021). Bibliometric analysis on online physics learning during COVID-19 Pandemic: Contribution to physics education undergraduate program. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2110(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2110/1/012018

Jung, J. (2020). Diagnosing causes of pre-service literature teachers’ misconceptions on the narrator and focalizer using a two-tier test. Education Sciences, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10040104

Kaltakci-Gurel, D., Eryilmaz, A., & McDermott, L. C. (2017). Development and application of a four-tier test to assess pre-service physics teachers’ misconceptions about geometrical optics. Research in Science and Technological Education, 35(2), 238–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2017.1310094

Klammer, J. (1998). An Overview of Techniques for Identifying , Acknowledging and Overcoming Alternate Conceptions in Physics Education. Klingenstein Project Report, Teachers College-Columbia University., 40.

Kotsis, K. T., & Panagou, D. (2022). Using Alternative Ideas for Determining the Learning Curve on the Concept of Force. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10(4), 495–506. https://doi.org/10.30935/SCIMATH/12251

Krebs, R. E. (1999). Scientific development and misconceptions through the ages: A reference guide. Bloomsbury Publishing.

Liu, G., & Fang, N. (2016). Student misconceptions about force and acceleration in physics and engineering mechanics education. International Journal of Engineering Education, 32(1), 19–29.

Mohamed Shaffril, H. A., Samsuddin, S. F., & Abu Samah, A. (2021). The ABC of systematic literature review: the basic methodological guidance for beginners. Quality and Quantity, 55(4), 1319–1346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-020-01059-6

Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2010). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. International Journal of Surgery, 8(5), 336–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.02.007

Muhammad, M. (2022). Review of Trends in Learning Media of Augmented Reality Integrated with STEM Approach to Improve Students’ Creative Thinking Skill. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2377(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2377/1/012084

Munggarani, M. E., Supriyati, Y., & Astra, I. M. (2021). Identifying high school students’ misconceptions using digital four-tier diagnostic tests in distance learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2019(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2019/1/012016

Nasrudin, D., Setiawan, A., Rusdiana, D., & Liliasari. (2022). Renewable Energy Online Learning: a Systematic Literature Network Analysis. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 17, 83–91.

Neidorf, T., Arora, A., Erberber, E., Tsokodayi, Y., & Mai, T. (2019). Student Misconceptions and Errors in Physics and Mathematics. In IEA Research for Education (Vol. 9).

O’Dea, R. E., Lagisz, M., Jennions, M. D., Koricheva, J., Noble, D. W. A., Parker, T. H., Gurevitch, J., Page, M. J., Stewart, G., Moher, D., & Nakagawa, S. (2021). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses in ecology and evolutionary biology: a PRISMA extension. Biological Reviews, 96(5), 1695–1722. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12721

Page, M. J., & Moher, D. (2017). Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: A scoping review. Systematic Reviews, 6(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0663-8

Pecharsky, V. K., & Gschneidner Jr, K. A. (2001). Some common misconceptions concerning magnetic refrigerant materials. Journal of Applied Physics, 90(9), 4614–4622.

Peşman, H., & Eryilmaz, A. (2010). Development of a three-tier test to assess misconceptions about simple electric circuits. Journal of Educational Research, 103(3), 208–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670903383002

Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66(2), 211–227. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730660207

Prahani, B. K., Rizki, I. A., Jatmiko, B., Suprapto, N., & Amelia, T. (2022). Artificial Intelligence in Education Research During the Last Ten Years: A Review and Bibliometric Study. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 17(8), 169–188. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v17i08.29833

Puspitasari, R., Mufit, F., & Asrizal. (2021). Conditions of learning physics and students’ understanding of the concept of motion during the covid-19 pandemic. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1876(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1876/1/012045

Putra, A. S. U., Hamidah, I., & Nahadi. (2020). The development of five-tier diagnostic test to identify misconceptions and causes of students’ misconceptions in waves and optics materials. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1521(2). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1521/2/022020

Rahmawati, D. ., Jumadi, Kuswanto, H., & Oktaba, I. A. (2020). Identification of students’ misconception with isomorphic multiple choices test on the force and newton’s law material. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1440(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1440/1/012052

Reiner, M., Slotta, J. D., Chi, M. T. H., & Resnick, L. B. (2000). Naive physics reasoning: A commitment to substance-based conceptions. Cognition and Instruction, 18(1), 1–34.

Resbiantoro, G., Setiani, R., & Dwikoranto. (2022). A Review of Misconception in Physics: The Diagnosis, Causes, and Remediation. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 19(2), 403–427. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2022.128

Risa, E., Hakim, L., Ratnaningdyah, D., & Sulistyowati, R. (2021). Pengembangan Lkpd Berbasis Problem Solving Berbantuan Software Tracker Untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Pemecahan Masalah Di Sma. Jambura Physics Journal, 3(1), 42–53. https://doi.org/10.34312/jpj.v3i1.8705

Sharma, S., & Ahluwalia, P. K. (2020). Alternative approaches in digital era to handle undergraduate physics (mechanics) laboratory: A case study of moment of inertia of a flywheel experiment. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1512(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1512/1/012027

Sih, G. C. (1973). Some basic problems in fracture mechanics and new concepts. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 5(2), 365–377.

Sundaygara, C., Gusi, L. A. R. P., Pratiwi, H. Y., Ayu, H. D., Jufriadi, A., & Hudha, M. N. (2021). Identification students’ misconception using four-tier diagnostic test on Newton Law subject. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1869(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1869/1/012157

Vosniadou, S. (1994). Capturing and modeling the process of conceptual change. Learning and Instruction, 4(1), 45–69.

Vosniadou, S. (2019). The development of students’ understanding of science. Frontiers in Education, 4, 32.

Zahro, R., Jumadi, Wilujeng, I., & Kuswanto, H. (2019). The Effect of Web-Assisted Problem Based Learning Model on Physics Conceptual Understanding of 10th Grade Students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1233(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1233/1/012058

• pdf