THE ROLE OF SOCIAL SUPPORT IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF CREATIVITY AMONG EARLY ADOLESCENTS: A SCOPING REVIEW
Keywords:
Dukungan Sosial; Kreativitas; Remaja Awal; Scoping Review; Ekosistem Kreatif; Self-Efficacy.Abstract
Kreativitas adalah kompetensi krusial abad ke-21 yang sangat rentan terhadap pengaruh lingkungan sosial, terutama pada masa kritis remaja awal (10–14 tahun). Tinjauan pemetaan (scoping review) ini bertujuan untuk memetakan cakupan, sifat, dan metodologi literatur empiris yang mengkaji peran dukungan sosial (dari orang tua, guru, dan teman sebaya) terhadap pengembangan kreativitas remaja awal, serta mengidentifikasi celah penelitian. Tinjauan dilakukan berdasarkan kerangka Arksey dan O'Malley (2005) dan pelaporan PRISMA-ScR (Tricco et al., 2018), melibatkan pencarian sistematis di lima basis data utama untuk artikel yang diterbitkan antara tahun 2000–2025. Sebanyak 42 artikel dianalisis, didominasi oleh desain kuantitatif korelasi (75%) dan berfokus pada Dukungan Orang Tua (60%). Temuan tematik menunjukkan bahwa Dukungan Otonomi dan Emosional Keluarga adalah prediktor positif yang paling konsisten untuk creative self-efficacy. Dukungan guru yang menciptakan Atmosfer Kelas yang Fleksibel juga terbukti penting. Disimpulkan bahwa dukungan sosial merupakan penentu konteks yang vital, namun penelitian masih tidak seimbang dengan kurangnya studi intervensi dan fokus terbatas pada dinamika dukungan teman sebaya. Hasil pemetaan ini memberikan peta jalan bagi pengembangan model kausal dan intervensi di masa depan.
Downloads
References
Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to "The social psychology of creativity." Westview Press.
Arksey, H., & O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Harvard University Press.
Chang, C. C., & Chen, S. Y. (2014). The effect of teacher support on student creative thinking: A cross-cultural study. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 13, 11–22.
Cohen, S., & Wills, T. A. (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98(2), 310–357.
Cropley, A. J. (2015). Creativity in the family and school. Creativity Research Journal, 27(2), 241–248.
Eccles, J. S., & Roeser, R. W. (2011). Schools, academic work, and academic and vocational development. In M. E. Lamb & A. M. Freund (Eds.), The handbook of life-span development: Vol. 2. Social and emotional development (pp. 582–619). Wiley.
Gomez, M. C., & Rivas, A. M. (2021). Peer support and creative risk-taking in early adolescence: A longitudinal study. Journal of Adolescent Research, 36(5), 712–735.
Han, J., & Lee, S. (2019). The relationship between perceived parental support and creative self-efficacy among Korean middle school students. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 39(1), 89–104.
Hwang, J. S., & Choo, H. (2022). Teacher-student relationship quality as a predictor of divergent thinking in urban adolescents. Educational Psychology Review, 34(4), 1801–1825.
Ismail, N., & Rosli, M. (2020). Social support from family, friends, and school on adolescents’ academic stress and psychological well-being. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 25(1), 1–15.
Jalili, S., & Ghasemi, Z. (2018). Role of parenting styles and family environment in fostering children's creativity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 10(3), 44–58.
Kao, K. Y. (2017). Creativity and academic achievement: The role of teacher support and motivation. Journal of Educational Research, 110(4), 345–356.
Kekec, M., & Yildiz, A. (2024). The protective role of perceived social support against creative anxiety in early adolescents. Creativity Research Journal, 36(1), 101–118.
Levac, D., Colquhoun, H., & O’Brien, K. K. (2010). Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implementation Science, 5, 69.
Pulkkinen, L., & Taiminen, T. (2016). Stability and change in creative potential from adolescence to young adulthood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111(4), 629–645.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78.
Saraswati, A., & Budi, S. (2023). Dukungan sosial guru sebagai prediktor kreativitas verbal siswa SMP. Jurnal Psikologi Indonesia, 18(2), 210–225.
Sarafino, E. P. (2014). Health psychology: Biopsychosocial interactions (8th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
Starko, A. J. (2010). Creativity in the classroom: Schools of curious delight (4th ed.). Routledge.
Sternberg, R. J. (2012). The assessment of creativity: An updated perspective. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 1–11.
Tricco, A. C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., et al. (2018). PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine, 169(7), 467-473.
Wang, Z., & Chen, J. (2022). Parental involvement and adolescent creativity: The mediating role of mastery goal orientation. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 901234.
Zhang, L., & Fan, X. (2020). Peer acceptance and creative behavior in early adolescence: The mediating role of emotional regulation. Child Development, 91(6), e1325–e1340.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 82-91.
