ANALISIS YURIDIS PENERAPAN UNSUR PERMUFAKATAN JAHAT DALAM PUTUSAN TINDAK PIDANA NARKOTIKA NOMOR 751/PID.SUS/2024/PN SERANG

• Rahayu Setia Ningrum

  Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pamulang Serang

  Author

• Muhamad Rafi Fadly

  Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pamulang Serang

  Author

• Muhamad Abdullah

  Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pamulang Serang

  Author

• Harry Setiawan

  Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pamulang Serang

  Author

• Dede Ika Murofikoh

  Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pamulang Serang

  Author

Criminal acts of narcotics in the Indonesian criminal justice system are positioned as serious crimes that demand a firm and effective law enforcement response. One of the legal instruments frequently employed in this context is the application of the element of criminal conspiracy, as regulated under Article 132 paragraph (1) of Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics. Conceptually, this element requires the existence of a clear and conscious agreement of intent between two or more individuals to commit a narcotics-related crime. However, in judicial practice, its application often experiences an expansion of meaning that may blur the line between factual involvement and actual criminal agreement. This study aims to conduct a juridical analysis of the application of the element of criminal conspiracy in the Serang District Court Decision Number 751/Pid.Sus/2024/PN Serang, with an emphasis on the judges’ legal considerations in proving the existence of the perpetrators’ consensual intent. The research method employed is normative legal research with statutory, conceptual, and case approaches, supported by a literature review of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The analysis shows that the judges’ considerations in the decision tend to focus on the sequence of events, communication relationships, and the roles of the defendants in the overall narcotics crime, without sufficient in-depth examination of the proof of active and reciprocal consensual intent. Such an approach implies an expansion of the meaning of criminal conspiracy, potentially equating the position of the principal offender with parties having limited involvement. Therefore, it can be concluded that the application of the element of criminal conspiracy in this decision does not fully reflect the principles of caution and proportionality in criminal law. Narcotics law enforcement still requires a balance between the effectiveness of crime eradication and the protection of legal certainty as well as substantive justice for the defendants.

Arief, Barda Nawawi, Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana : Perkembangan Penyusunan Konsep KUHP Baru, Kencana, 2017

———, ‘Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana’, PT Citra Aditya Bakti, 2018

Fadillah, Reza Riski, ‘Penafsiran Hukum Terhadap Permufakatan Jahat Dalam Pasal 132 Ayat (1)’, Jurnal Panji Keadilan, 4 (2025), 2444 <https://doi.org/10.36085/jpk.v4i2.2444>

Harahap, M.Yahya, Pembahasan Permasalahan Dan Penerapan KUHAP, Pemeriksaan Sidang Pengadilan, Banding, Kasasi, Dan Peninjauan Kembali: Edisi Kedua,Sinar Grafika, Jakarta (Sinar Grafika, 2016)

Hasibuan, Imelda, Muhammad Japri, and Desy Ratnasari, ‘Juridical Analysis of the Evidentiary Practice in Criminal Conspiracy in Narcotics Cases’, Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review, 6 (2025), 454 <https://doi.org/10.56371/jirpl.v6i3.454>

Huda, Chairul, Dari Tiada Pidana Tanpa Kesalahan Menuju Kepada Tiada Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Tanpa Kesalahan, Kencana Prenada Media, 2006

Johnny Ibrahim, ‘Teori & Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif’, in Teori Metodologi Penelitian A., 2013

Komariah Emong Sapardjaja, ‘Ajaran Sifat Melawan Hukum Materiel Dalam Hukum Pidana Indonesia’, in Revisi Ketiga, 2022

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud, Penelitian Hukum: Edisi Revisi, Cet.ke-13 (jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2017)

Moeljanto, Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana (Edisi Revisi), Jakarta : Rineka Cipta, 2008

Pamungkas, Teguh Karya, Rinda Izza Azhelia, and Ach. Ilyasi, ‘Analisis Putusan Nomor 70/Pid.Sus/2024/PN Jmr: Permufakatan Jahat Dalam Tindak Pidana Narkotika’, Welfare State Jurnal Hukum, 4 (2025), 244–56 <https://doi.org/10.56013/welfarestate.v4i2.3669>

Pengadilan Negeri Serang, ‘Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Serang Nomor 751/Pid.Sus/2024/PN SRG’ (Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia, 2024) <https://putusan.mahkamahagung.go.id>

Republik Indonesia, ‘Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 Tentang Narkotika’ (Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia, 2009)

Soekanto, Soerjono, and Sri Mamudji, Penelitian Hukum Normatif Suatu Tinjauan, Singkat, Jakarta: CV. Rajawali, 2019, I

Soesilo, R, ‘Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP): Serta Komentar-Komentarnya Lengkap Pasal Demi Pasal: Untuk Para Pejabat Kepolisian Negara, Kejaksaan …’, (No Title), 1974

• pdf