PERLINDUNGAN ASET DIGITAL PERSPEKTIF HUKUM PERDATA INTERNASIONALDALAM DUNIA METAVERSE: TANTANGAN DAN SOLUSI

Authors

  • Chandra Bismo Saputra

    Universitas Pakuan
    Author

  • Daveran Shekam Selwin

    Universitas Pakuan
    Author

  • Geofandy Laksono Jati

    Universitas Pakuan
    Author

  • Maulidina Fikal Nugraha

    Universitas Pakuan
    Author

  • Muhammad Farhan Ardabillyi

    Universitas Pakuan
    Author

  • Yenny Febrianty

    Universitas Pakuan
    Author
Keywords:
International Private Law, Metaverse, NFT, Jurisdiction, Lex Blockchain.
Abstract

The phenomenon of the Metaverse and Non-Fungible
Token (NFT) digital assets has triggered private disputes
involving cross-border elements, directly challenging
traditional International Private Law (IPL) rules . This
research aims to analyze the challenges in determining
jurisdiction and choice of law, and to formulate adaptive
IPL solutions. The study employs a normative legal
research methodology with a descriptive-analytical
approach, utilizing secondary data gathered through
library research and qualitatively analyzing relevant
legislation and IPL doctrines. The results and discussion
indicate that traditional IPL rules are failing; Lex Loci
Actus and Lex Situs become obscured due to the
decentralized nature of the assets. Furthermore, the
validity of NFT contracts is threatened by the potential
violation of the principle of "lawful cause" which risks
contravening IPL's Public Policy (Openbare Orde). As a
solution, this study recommends formulating new
connecting factor rules: Digital Domicile as the
determinant of jurisdiction, and Lex Blockchain as the
replacement for Lex Situs in digital asset property
disputes. The implementation of these solutions requires
Indonesia to adopt legal flexibility principles and actively
promote the harmonization of the digital legal
framework in international forums.

References

A. Legislasi

Indonesia. Undang-Undang tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik. UU No. 11

Tahun 2008.

Indonesia. Undang-Undang tentang Perlindungan Data Pribadi. UU No. 27 Tahun 2022.

Indonesia. Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata (KUHPerdata).

Indonesia. Undang-Undang tentang Merek dan Indikasi Geografis. UU No. 20 Tahun

2016.

B. Artikel Jurnal

Heriyanto, Bambang. “Kompetensi Absolut Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Berdasarkan

Paradigma UU No. 30 Tahun 2014 tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan”. Pakuan

Law Review No. 1 (2016) : 82.

Ambarwati, Dwi. “Urgensi Pembaharuan Hukum di Era Metaverse dalam Perspektif

Hukum Progresif.” Jurnal Dialektika Vol. 7 No. 2 (2022): 151–

167.

Barlian, Ucu Cahyana, Neni Ismelani, dan Ahmad Manan. “Metaverse sebagai Upaya

Menghadapi Tantangan Pendidikan di Masa Depan.” Journal of Educational and

Language Research (JOEL) Vol. 1 No. 12 (2022): 2133–

2139.

Dragono, Tony, Widiarty Sari, dan Bonar Nainggolan. “Perlindungan Aset Digital dalam

Dunia Metaverse Berdasarkan Hukum Nasional.” Jurnal Kewarganegaraan Vol. 7

No. 1 (2023): 742–753.

Febrianty, Yenny, Joko Sriwidodo, dan Priyaldi. “Establishing Regional Regulations for

the Protection of Local Wisdom.” Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 17 No. 3

(2023): 189–216.

Gunawan, Nia Fitri, Andi Satria Parhana, dan Rian Muhammad Fazri. “Metaverse as

Transformation and Innovation in Education in the Digital Era.” Hipkin Journal of

Educational Research Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024): 139–150.

Monalisa, Geralda. “Integrasi Hukum Perdata Internasional dalam Kerangka

Hukum Nasional Indonesia: Tantangan dan Implikasi.” Palangka Law Review Vol. 4

No. 2 (2024): 62–71.

Neesya, Ananda Bunga, Disie Sugihastuti Danoewijaya, Gita Amelia Lestari, Marsaulina A.

Sihombing, Suci Aulia, dan Yenny Febrianty. “Pendekatan Hukum Perdata

Internasional dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Hak Kekayaan Intelektual di Bidang

Merek: Kasus PUMA (Jerman) vs PUMA (Indonesia).” Jurnal Hukum dan

Kewarganegaraan Vol. 15 No. 12 (2025).

Pramudya Suhartanto, Feri, dan Yenny Febrianty. “Perbandingan Sistem Hukum Civil Law

dan Common Law.” Konsensus: Jurnal Ilmu Pertahanan, Hukum dan Ilmu

Komunikasi Vol. 1 No. 3 (2024): 72–83.

Ramdhani, Mochamad Arif, Neng Sri Imaniyati, dan Dwi Wiyanti. “Keabsahan Jual Beli

Non-Fungible Token (NFT) pada Metaverse yang Dimiliki oleh Ransverse Ditinjau

dari KUHPerdata dan Kompilasi Hukum Ekonomi Syariah.” Bandung Conference

Series: Law Studies Vol. 4 No. 1 (2023): 298–

307.

Ria Tri Vinata. “Penggunaan Teori Hukum Perdata Internasional terhadap Conflict of Law

dalam Transaksi Elektronik.” Perspektif Vol. XV No. 1 (2010): 64–68.

Sulistianingsih, Dwi, Muchamad Ihwan, Agus Setiawan, dan M. Sofyan Prabowo. “Tata

Kelola Perlindungan Data Pribadi di Era Metaverse (Telaah Yuridis UU Perlindungan

Data Pribadi).” Jurnal Masalah-Masalah Hukum Vol. 52 No. 1 (2023): 97–106.

Wildan, Achmad, Mila Sari Milah, Mochammad Taufik, dan Tati Santika. “Problematika

Hukum Aset Digital Era Disrupsi 5.0 di Indonesia melalui Pendekatan Legislasi.”

Jurnal Mahupas: Mahasiswa Hukum Unpas Vol. 1 No. 2 (2022): 67–88.

C. Buku

Satory, Agus, Yenny Febrianty, Widiyanti Rahayu Budi Astuti, dan Aditya Fajri Kurnia

Pradana. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Tahta Media Group, 2024. ISBN

978-623-147-561-9.

Cover Image
Downloads
Published
2026-01-22
Issue
Vol. 16 No. 3 (2026): Causa: Jurnal Hukum dan Kewarganegaraan, ISSN: 3031-0369
Section
Articles

How to Cite

PERLINDUNGAN ASET DIGITAL PERSPEKTIF HUKUM PERDATA INTERNASIONALDALAM DUNIA METAVERSE: TANTANGAN DAN SOLUSI. (2026). Causa: Jurnal Hukum Dan Kewarganegaraan, 16(3), 1651-1660. https://cibjournal.com/index.php/causa/article/view/7044

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

131-140 of 266

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.