THE INFLUENCE OF THE QUIZLET APPLICATION ON THE PRODUCTIVE VOCABULARY OF STUDENTS AT SMAN 3 KOTA SERANG

• Reinata Adeinda

  Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa

  Author

• Nurhaedah Gailea

  Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa

  Author

• Zakaria

  Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa

  Author

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh aplikasi Quizlet terhadap kosakata produktif siswa kelas sepuluh di SMAN 3 Kota Serang. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kuantitatif dengan desain kuasi-eksperimental, pre-test/post-test control group. Sampel terdiri dari dua kelas: kelompok eksperimen (n=35) yang menggunakan aplikasi Quizlet, dan kelompok kontrol (n=35) yang menggunakan metode pengajaran konvensional. Instrumen yang digunakan adalah tes melengkapi kalimat dengan petunjuk (cued sentence completion test), yang diadaptasi dari Productive Vocabulary Levels Test (PVLT), yang diberikan sebagai pre-test dan post-test. Data yang terkumpul dianalisis menggunakan statistik deskriptif dan Independent Samples T-Test. Hasil uji-t pada skor post-test menunjukkan perbedaan yang signifikan secara statistik antara kedua kelompok, dengan nilai signifikansi 0,032 (p < 0,05) yang lebih unggul pada kelompok eksperimen. Temuan ini menunjukkan bahwa model pedagogis Quizlet, yang menekankan pada praktik pemanggilan kembali memori (retrieval practice) dan umpan balik langsung (immediate feedback), secara signifikan lebih efektif dibandingkan model pasif yang berpusat pada guru dalam metode konvensional untuk meningkatkan kosakata produktif siswa. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa Quizlet merupakan sumber pedagogis efektif yang dapat memberikan kontribusi signifikan terhadap pemerolehan kosakata produktif siswa.

[1] E. Simonnet, M. Loiseau, and É. Lavoué, “A Systematic Literature Review of Technology‐Assisted Vocabulary Learning,” Computer Assisted Learning, vol. 41, no. 1, p. e13096, Feb. 2025, doi: 10.1111/jcal.13096.

[2] O. J. Ajogbeje, “Enhancing Classroom Learning Outcomes: The Power of Immediate Feedback Strategy,” International Journal of Disabilities Sports and Health Sciences, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 453–465, Oct. 2023, doi: 10.33438/ijdshs.1323080.

[3] T. Aliyeva, “Innovative Approaches to Foreign Language Learning: A Study of Methods Including Duolingo and Beyond,” Global Spectrum of Research and Humanities, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 73–80, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.69760/3twd9f85.

[4] D. Pipuš, “Introducing Vocabulary in the EFL Classroom,” in Proceedings of The 3rd International Academic Conference on Teaching, Learning and Education, GLOBALKS, July 2021. doi: 10.33422/3rd.tleconf.2021.07.150.

[5] I. S. P. Nation and S. Hunston, Learning Vocabulary in Another Language, 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press, 2013. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139858656.

[6] E. Marin-Garcia, A. T. Mattfeld, and J. D. E. Gabrieli, “Neural Correlates of Long-Term Memory Enhancement Following Retrieval Practice,” Front. Hum. Neurosci., vol. 15, p. 584560, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.584560.

[7] B. Strong, “Retrieval, repetition, and retention: unveiling vocabulary acquisition strategies for ESL learners,” AHOAJ, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 185–190, Oct. 2023, doi: 10.15406/ahoaj.2023.05.00206.

[8] N. Schmitt, “Review article: Instructed second language vocabulary learning,” Language Teaching Research, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 329–363, July 2008, doi: 10.1177/1362168808089921.

[9] T. Hao, Z. Wang, and Y. Ardasheva, “Technology-Assisted Vocabulary Learning for EFL Learners: A Meta-Analysis,” Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 645–667, July 2021, doi: 10.1080/19345747.2021.1917028.

[10] O. Chaikovska and L. Zbaravska, “THE EFFICIENCY OF QUIZLET-BASED EFL VOCABULARY LEARNING IN PREPARING UNDERGRADUATES FOR STATE ENGLISH EXAM,” AE, vol. 7, no. 14, pp. 84–90, May 2020, doi: 10.20535/2410-8286.197808.

[11] S. M. Haidari, S. Baysal, and S. Kanadli, “THE IMPACT OF DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY-MEDIATED FOREIGN LANGUAGE INSTRUCTION ON VOCABULARY LEARNING: A META-ANALYTIC REVIEW,” Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 236–251, Mar. 2020, doi: 10.17240/aibuefd.2020.20.52925-552769.

[12] H. P. Mukhtar, Z. Ali, and R. Amal, “The Importance of Vocabulary in Reading Among EFL Learners,” presented at the International Conference of Research on Language Education, Sept. 2023, pp. 681–691. doi: 10.15405/epes.23097.61.

[13] L. Q. Nguyen and H. V. Le, “The Role of Quizlet Learning Tool in Learners’ Lexical Retention: A Quasi-Experimental Study,” Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn., vol. 18, no. 03, pp. 38–50, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.3991/ijet.v18i03.34919.

[14] G. Alrajafi, “The use of English in Indonesia: Status and Influence,” SIGEH, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–10, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.36269/sigeh.v1i1.355.

[15] N. Bayaksud, Putu Dian Danayanti Degeng, and Khairil Azwar Razali, “The Use of Quizlet for Vocabulary Learning: A Lesson from Innovative Application,” JOLLS. Lang. Liter. Studies, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 244–255, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.36312/jolls.v4i1.1823.

[16] S. Montaner-Villalba, “The use of Quizlet to enhance vocabulary in the English language classroom,” in CALL and complexity – short papers from EUROCALL 2019, 1st ed., Research-publishing.net, 2019, pp. 304–309. doi: 10.14705/rpnet.2019.38.1027.

[17] S. Halim and T. Halim, “Usefulness and Learnability in Teaching Vocabulary to ESL/EFL Students,” GRHE, vol. 2, no. 1, p. 65, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.22158/grhe.v2n1p65.

• pdf