REPRESENTASI KEADILAN DAN INSTITUSI DALAM FILM V FOR VENDETTA (2005)

Authors

  • Nessa Nabila Windaputri Universitas Airlangga Author
  • Erindah Dimisyqiyani Universitas Airlangga Author
  • Amaliyah Amaliyah Universitas Airlangga Author
  • Gagas Gayuh Aji Universitas Airlangga Author
  • Rizky Amalia Sinulingga Universitas Airlangga Author

Keywords:

V for Vendetta, keadilan, institusi, kekuasaan, otoritarianisme, perlawanan sosial

Abstract

Film V for Vendetta (2005) mengisahkan perjuangan seorang tokoh misterius bernama V yang menentang rezim totaliter di Inggris. Latar belakang penelitian berasal dari fenomena ketidakadilan dan penindasan yag digambarkan melalui karakter V, serta resistensis masyarakat terhadap rezim totaliter. Narasi film ini menampilkan ketegangan antara institusi negara yang represif dengan rakyat yang berusaha merebut kebebasan. Tokoh V hadir sebagai simbol perlawanan, namun pemerintah menggunakan media, sensor, dan propaganda untuk menjaga kekuasaannya. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kualitatif deskriptif untuk mengamati simbol, dialog, dokumentasi, dan gestur yang mencerminkan isu keadilan serta legitimasi institusi. Temuan penelitian menunjukkan bahwa film tidak hanya menghadirkan hiburan, tapi juga berfungsi sebagai refleksi kritis terhadap bahaya otoritarianisme, serta membuka ruang bagi penonton untuk menilai makna sejati dari keadilan dan kebebasan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa film menampilkan bentuk keadilan sebagai perjuangan kolektif melawan kekuasaan otoriter, sementara institusi digambarkan sebagai instrumen kontrol yang menekan kebebasan. Kesimpulan dari penelitian ini adalah film V for Vendetta merefleksikan isu keadilan sosial dan kebebasan politik yang relevan dengan konteks pembangunan berkelanjutan (SDGs), khususnya pada aspek perdamaian, keadilan, dan kelembagaan yang kuat.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anderson MH, Sun PYT (2017) Reviewing leadership styles: Overlaps and the need for a new ‘ full-range’ theory. Int J Manag Rev. 19:76– 96.

Aveen A (2025) Cinema as empowerment: Marginal voices and political resistance.

Journal of Film and Cultural Studies. 12(2):45– 60.

Bond J (2025) Race, identity, and systemic injustice in legal practices. Law and Society Review. 59(1):112– 134.

Bradshaw C, Atkinson S, Doody O (2017) Employing a qualitative descriptive approach in health care research. Glob Qual Nurs Res. 4:1– 8.

Burton RM, Obel B (2018) The science of organizational design: Fit between structure and coordination. J Organization Design. 7(1):1– 13.

Creswell JW, Poth CN (2018) Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.

Denzin NK, Lincoln YS (2018) The SAGE handbook of qualitative research. 5th ed.

Thousand Oaks: SAGE.

Doyle L, McCabe C, Keogh B, Brady A, McCann M (2020) An overview of the qualitative descriptive design within nursing research. J Res Nurs.

25(5):443– 455.

Fayard AL, Weeks J, Khan M (2022) Justice, institutions, and human capabilities. J Bus Ethics. 175(3):615– 629.

Hoch JE, Bommer WH, Dulebohn JH, Wu D (2018) Do ethical, authentic, and servant leadership explain variance above and beyond transformational leadership? A meta-analysis. J Manage. 44(2):501– 529.

Jones GR, George JM (2015) Contemporary management. 9th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Education.

Kubrak T (2020) Impact of films: Changes in young people’ s attitudes after watching a movie. Behavioral Sciences. 10(5):86.

Lerner JS, Li Y, Valdesolo P, Kassam KS (2015) Emotion and decision making.

Annu Rev Psychol. 66:799– 823.

Milićević J, Drndarević N (2023) Media representations of prison life: Public perceptions of justice and punishment. Crime, Media, Culture. 19(2):195– 212.

Möller K, Badr R (2024) Law, justice, and institutional legitimacy: Media representations in contemporary societies. J Law Media Stud. 18(1):22– 39.

Pramaggiore M, Wallis T (2011) Film: A critical introduction. 3rd ed. London:

Laurence King Publishing.

Rawls J (2001) Justice as fairness: A restatement. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Reddan MC, Young H, Falkner C, Wager TD (2024) Narrative media and empathy:

Film’ s role in shaping social attitudes. Media Psychology. 27(1):88– 107.

Robbins SP, Coulter M (2018) Management. 14th ed. London: Pearson.

Robbins SP, Judge TA (2015) Organizational behavior. 16th ed. London: Pearson.

Sen A (2009) The idea of justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Smith A (2017) Decision-making in organizations: Rationality and emotion. J Organiz Behav. 38(2):243– 262.

Smith C (2019) Observing media texts: Methodologies in visual research. Visual Studies. 34(3):256– 269.

Žižek S (2011) Living in the end times. London: Verso.

Downloads

Published

2025-09-28

How to Cite

REPRESENTASI KEADILAN DAN INSTITUSI DALAM FILM V FOR VENDETTA (2005). (2025). Triwikrama: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, 11(6), 61-70. https://cibjournal.com/index.php/triwikrama/article/view/116

Similar Articles

51-60 of 382

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.