ANALYSIS OF SARCASM FOUND IN SAMSUNG ADVERTISEMENTS

Main Article Content

Vizzia Analisa
Yohannes Telaumbanua
Hamidah Izzatu Laily

Abstract

This research analyzes the types and communicative functions of sarcasm found in Samsung advertisements, particularly in the Samsung Makes Fun of Apple campaign. Using a descriptive qualitative method, it applies discourse analysis based on Gee‟s (2021) framework, which explores how language constructs meaning, identity, and social relationships. The data were obtained through non-participant observation and documentation of 14 Samsung YouTube videos, identifying 109 sarcastic expressions. Analysis refers to Camp‟s (2012) classification of sarcasm: propositional, lexical, like-prefixed, and illocutionary. Functions examined include criticizing, entertaining, indirect persuasion, asserting superiority, and emphasizing. Coding was performed manually, based on Saldaña (2021) procedure, which classified each sarcastic unit according to type and function. Results indicate that sarcasm is intentionally employed to mock competitors or to emphasise Samsung‟s strengths, by means of non-literal meanings obtained from a divergence between the said and the intended message. The paper extends discourse analysis of advertising and yields implications for marketers who seek to create compelling communication.

Article Details

Section

Articles

How to Cite

ANALYSIS OF SARCASM FOUND IN SAMSUNG ADVERTISEMENTS. (2025). Argopuro: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa, 11(5), 21-30. https://cibjournal.com/index.php/argopuro/article/view/1112

References

Attardo, S. (2000). Irony markers and functions: Towards a goal-oriented theory of irony and its processing. Rask: International Journal of Language and Communication, 12, 3–20.

Batista, D. S., Silva, T. C., & Carvalho, F. M. (2022). The persuasive power of irony in brand advertising: A multimodal approach. Journal of Pragmatics, 198, 45–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2022.04.007

Bouazizi, M., & Otsuki Ohtsuki, T. (2016). A pattern-based approach for sarcasm detection on Twitter. IEEE Access, 4, 5477–5488. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2016.2594194

Camp, E. (2012). Sarcasm, pretense, and the semantics/pragmatics distinction. Nous, 46(4), 587–634. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0068.2010.00825.x

Clark, H. H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge University Press.

Colston, H. L. (2017). Using figurative language. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316271983

Dancygier, B., & Sweetser, E. (2014). Figurative language. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139600005

Danielyan, A. (2022). Linguistic strategies in modern advertising: The power of words in persuasion. Language and Communication Studies, 15(2), 33–45.

Dobrovol’skij, D., & Piirainen, E. (2021). Cultural models in figurative language: The case of irony and sarcasm. Lexis: Journal in English Lexicology, 18, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.4000/lexis.5510

Dynel, M. (2017). Irony, deception and humour: Seeking the truth about overt and covert untruthfulness. De Gruyter Mouton.

Filik, R., Turcan, A., Thompson, D., Harvey, N., Davies, H., & Turner, A. (2016). Sarcasm and emoticons: Comprehension and emotional impact. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69(11), 2130–2146. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2015.1106566

Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics: Speech acts (Vol. 3, pp. 41–58). Academic Press.

Khadafi, M. (2024). A pragmatic analysis of sarcasm in online comments. Journal of Language and Discourse Studies, 12(1), 77–89.

Krašek, M. (2021). Sarcasm and irony in digital communication: Pragmatic and contextual perspectives. Linguistica, 61(2), 201–222. https://doi.org/10.4312/linguistica.61.2.201-222

Mangelen, E. M., Siagian, R., & Tarigan, M. (2023). Figurative language in advertising discourse: A stylistic analysis. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Communication, 7(1), 56–68.

Mathur, A., Chandra, S., & Kapoor, V. (2022). Humor and sarcasm in advertising: Effects on consumer engagement and message retention. Journal of Marketing Communications, 28(6), 645–662. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527266.2020.1794695

McQuarrie, E. F., & Phillips, B. J. (2005). Indirect persuasion in advertising: How consumers process metaphors presented in pictures and words. Journal of Advertising, 34(2), 7–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2005.10639188

Pickering, L., Clark, J., & Stewart, K. (2018). Sarcasm, irony, and humor in communication: A pragmatic approach. Routledge.

Ray, A., Paul, S., & Singh, R. (2022). Computational approaches to detecting sarcasm in online discourse. Computational Linguistics, 48(3), 731–755. https://doi.org/10.1162/coli_a_00452

Riloff, E., Qadir, A., Surve, P., De Silva, L., Gilbert, N., & Huang, R. (2013). Sarcasm as contrast between a positive sentiment and negative situation. Proceedings of EMNLP 2013, 704–714.

Saragih, R. A., Manurung, N., & Lubis, L. (2023). A pragmatic analysis of sarcasm in the “Wednesday” Netflix series. Linguistic Studies Journal, 5(2), 88–99.

Sari, P. A. (2023). The use of sarcasm in Meghan Trainor’s “Mother” song lyrics. Journal of Language and Literature Studies, 10(3), 112–120.

Saldaña, J. (2021). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1986). Relevance: Communication and cognition. Harvard University Press.

Sykora, M. D., Jackson, T. W., O’Brien, A., & Elayan, S. (2020). Social media sarcasm detection: A multimodal approach. Information Processing & Management, 57(4), 102253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2019.102253

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.