PERAN NILAI KEMANUSIAAN DALAM MENINGKATKAN STANDAR PROFESIONALISME APARAT PENEGAK HUKUM

• Selvy

  Universitas Islam Al-Ihya Kuningan

  Author

• Ade Aspandi

  Universitas Islam Al-Ihya Kuningan

  Author

• Vira Natasya

  Universitas Islam Al-Ihya Kuningan

  Author

The professionalism of law enforcement officers is a crucial element in realizing a just and dignified justice system. This article analyzes the role of humanitarian values ​​as an ethical foundation in improving the standards of professionalism of law enforcement officers in Indonesia. Using a qualitative approach and literature review, this research examines how humanitarian values ​​such as empathy, integrity, and respect for human dignity can transform law enforcement practices. The analysis shows that internalizing humanitarian values ​​in training systems, institutional policies, and oversight mechanisms can significantly improve the quality of legal services, reduce abuse of authority, and build public trust. These findings confirm that true professionalism is not only about technical competence but also about a commitment to universal human values. This article recommends the integration of humanitarian values-based character education into the law enforcement officer education curriculum and the strengthening of accountability mechanisms oriented towards protecting human rights.

 Keywords: humanitarian values, professionalism, law enforcement officers, legal ethics, human rights

DASAR HUKUM

Peraturan Kepala Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 14 Tahun 2011 tentang Kode Etik Profesi Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia.

Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 2 Tahun 2002 tentang Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia (Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2002 Nomor 2, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 4168).

United Nations. (1948). Universal Declaration of Human Rights. New York: United Nations.

United Nations. (1984). Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment. New York: United Nations.

ARTIKEL JURNAL

Bayley, D. H., & Perito, R. M. (2011). Police Corruption: What Past Scandals Teach about Current Challenges. Washington: United States Institute of Peace.

Birzer, M. L., & Tannehill, R. (2001). A More Effective Training Approach for Contemporary Policing. Police Quarterly, 4(2), 233-252.

Brown, M. E., & Trevino, L. K. (2006). Ethical Leadership: A Review and Future Directions. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(6), 595-616.

Chan, J. (1997). Changing Police Culture: Policing in a Multicultural Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Cockcroft, T., & Beattie, I. (2009). Shifting Cultures: Managerialism and the Rise of 'Performance'. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 32(3), 526-540.

Firdaus, A. (2019). Implementasi Pelatihan Hak Asasi Manusia dalam Meningkatkan Profesionalisme Kepolisian di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan, 49(3), 612-628.

Hoffman, M. L. (2000). Empathy and Moral Development: Implications for Caring and Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Klockars, C. B., Ivkovich, S. K., Harver, W. E., & Haberfeld, M. R. (2000). The Measurement of Police Integrity. Washington: National Institute of Justice.

Komisi Nasional Hak Asasi Manusia Republik Indonesia. (2020). Laporan Tahunan 2020. Jakarta: Komnas HAM RI.

Luna, E. (2000). Accountability and the Criminal Justice System. In Criminal Justice 2000: Boundary Changes in Criminal Justice Organizations (Vol. 2, pp. 19-75). Washington: National Institute of Justice.

Manning, P. K. (1978). The Police: Mandate, Strategies, and Appearances. In Policing: A View from the Street (pp. 7-31). Santa Monica: Goodyear Publishing.

Mazerolle, L., Bennett, S., Davis, J., Sargeant, E., & Manning, M. (2013). Legitimacy in Policing: A Systematic Review. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 9(1), 1-147.

Neyroud, P., & Beckley, A. (2001). Policing, Ethics and Human Rights. Cullompton: Willan Publishing.

Pratt, J. (2008). Scandinavian Exceptionalism in an Era of Penal Excess: Part I: The Nature and Roots of Scandinavian Exceptionalism. The British Journal of Criminology, 48(2), 119-137.

Rahr, S., & Rice, S. K. (2015). From Warriors to Guardians: Recommitting American Police Culture to Democratic Ideals. New Perspectives in Policing Bulletin. Washington: National Institute of Justice.

Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Sherman, L. W. (2018). Reducing Fatal Police Shootings as System Crashes: Research, Theory, and Practice. Annual Review of Criminology, 1, 421-449.

Skogan, W. G., & Hartnett, S. M. (1997). Community Policing, Chicago Style. New York: Oxford University Press.

Stone, C., & Travis, J. (2011). Toward a New Professionalism in Policing. New Perspectives in Policing Bulletin. Washington: National Institute of Justice.

Studlar, D. T., & Namboodiri, K. (2010). Preventive Drug Testing in Custody: Procedural Justice and Substance Abusing Defendants. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38(2), 125-134.

Tyler, T. R. (2004). Enhancing Police Legitimacy. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 593(1), 84-99.

Walker, S. (2005). The New World of Police Accountability. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.

Worden, R. E. (1993). The Attitudes of Women and Men in Policing: Testing Conventional and Contemporary Wisdom. Criminology, 31(2), 203-241.

• pdf