PENERAPAN BALANCED SCORECARD ALAT UKUR PENILAIAN KINERJA PADA DINAS PENDAPATAN, PENGELOLAAN KEUANGAN, DAN ASET DAERAH
Published 2025-12-13
Keywords
- Balanced Scorecard,
- Performance Measurement,
- Regional Revenue Agency
How to Cite
Abstract
In the modern era, demands for fast, transparent, and responsive public services drive government agencies to develop comprehensive performance measurement systems. The Regional Revenue, Financial Management, and Assets Agency (DPPKAD) of NTT, as a strategic institution in regional financial management, requires a performance measurement tool that not only focuses on financial aspects but also includes service effectiveness, internal processes, and staff capacity. This study aims to analyze the implementation of the Balanced Scorecard (BSC) as a performance measurement tool at DPPKAD NTT. The research method utilizes secondary data from the Central Bureau of Statistics for 2022, with descriptive analysis through the four BSC perspectives: financial, customer, internal business processes, and learning and growth. The results indicate that from the financial perspective, the Regional Original Revenue (PAD) Effectiveness Ratio increased significantly from 103.69% (2021) to 108.81% (2022), showing an improvement in the region's ability to collect revenue. From the customer perspective, DPPKAD has optimized services through priority programs, such as the construction of tax payment depots. In the internal business process perspective, the agency strives to improve service quality and build public trust. Meanwhile, from the learning and growth perspective, the agency's operations have complied with established procedures. The study concludes that the implementation of BSC can provide a more holistic and structured overview of DPPKAD NTT's performance. For further optimization, it is recommended that the agency consistently apply the performance assessment system using the four BSC perspectives, supported by actual and detailed supervision to encourage performance improvement and regional financial independence.
Downloads
References
- Dewi, S. P., & Homan, H. S. (2024). Pengaruh penerapan Balanced Scorecard terhadap kinerja manajemen. Riset Akuntansi dan Perbankan, 18(1), 45–58.
- Ganang, T., Simbolon, N. L., & Mangani, K. S. (2023). Evaluating the implementation of Balanced Scorecard in employee performance appraisal. The Winners Journal, 24(2), 101–112.
- Halim, A. (2003). Akuntansi Sektor Publik: Akuntansi Keuangan Daerah. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
- Himawan, F. A., & Juarsah. (2005). Balanced Scorecard sebagai alat pengukuran kinerja manajemen. Jurnal Esensi, 8(1), 79–90.
- Irsutami, & Ramadhani. (2011). Pengembangan pengukuran kinerja dengan pendekatan Balanced Scorecard. Jurnal Penelitian Politeknik Negeri Batam, 4(2), 13–24.
- Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
- Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2000). Balanced Scorecard: Menerapkan Strategi Menjadi Aksi. Jakarta: Erlangga.
- Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2001). Strategy-focused organization. Harvard Business Review, 79(6), 41–52.
- Mahmudi. (2009). Manajemen Kinerja Sektor Publik. Yogyakarta: UPP STIM YKPN.
- Mahsina, Poniwatie, A., & Cholifah. (2017). Analisis penerapan Balanced Scorecard sebagai alat ukur kinerja. Jurnal Maksipreneur, 6(2), 85–98.
- Malut, M. G., Baso, S. P., & Timuneno, A. Y. (2025). Integrasi transformasi digital melalui pendekatan Balanced Scorecard. Jurnal Akuntansi, Keuangan, dan Manajemen, 3(1), 55–67.
- Mulyadi. (2001). Balanced Scorecard: Alat Manajemen Kontemporer untuk Pelipatganda Kinerja Keuangan Perusahaan. Yogyakarta: Salemba Empat.
- Niven, P. R. (2003). Balanced Scorecard Step-by-Step for Government and Nonprofit Agencies. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
- Nørreklit, H. (2000). The balance on the Balanced Scorecard. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 11(1), 65–88.
- Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1996). SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions. Journal of Retailing, 64(1), 12–40.