KONTROVERSI REMISI DAN BEBAS BERSYARAT BAGI NARAPIDANA TERORISME: ANTARA KEADILAN DISTRIBUTIF DAN RESTORATIF

• Nadia Salvira Gonibala

  Universitas Negeri Gorontalo

  Author

• Ilham Ramadhan Ingo

  Translator

• Yuliana Habuge

  Translator

• Frisca Oktaviani Manueke

  Translator

• Verenissa Ayu Pratami Tahir

  Translator

• Siti Alya Rahma Tobelo

  Translator

• Hasnia

  Translator

This study examines terrorism as a special criminal offense in Indonesia by analyzing the case of Umar Patek as an illustrative example of legal implementation. The discussion focuses on the legal basis for classifying terrorism as an extraordinary crime, its broad social, economic, and political impacts, and the correctional treatment and placement of Umar Patek. The purpose of this study is to comprehensively examine the classification of terrorism as a special crime, analyze the impacts of these acts of terror, and examine the treatment given to Umar Patek during his sentence in a correctional institution, including different placement from general prisoners and various problems that arose in the implementation of his sentence.This research employs a normative legal method using statutory and conceptual approaches supported by primary and secondary legal materials. Findings show that terrorism possesses transnational, organized, and ideological characteristics requiring special legal instruments beyond the Indonesian Penal Code. The impacts of terrorism are extensive, ranging from physical destruction and psychological trauma to national instability and economic losses, as exemplified by the 2002 Bali Bombing. The study further identifies that Umar Patek’s treatment reflects his classification as a high-risk inmate, involving special detention blocks, deradicalization programs, and multi-layered supervision. The case also reveals issues of sentencing disparity and international sensitivity, particularly from affected countries.

Achmad Mauluddin Alfithon and Muhammad Syafiq, “Belas kasih diri pada narapidana kasus terorisme yang menjalani program deradikalisasi,” Jurnal Psikologi Ulayat 9, no. 1 (2022): 70, https://doi.org/10.24854/jpu343.

Ahmad Dani, “REMISI BAGI TERORIS PERSPEKTIF HUKUM PIDANA ISLAM”, IN RIGHT Jurnal Agama dan Hak Azazi Manusia, no. 2 (2012): 472. https://ejournal.uin-suka.ac.id/syariah/inright/article/view/1228/1058 .

Folman P. Ambarita, “Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Terorisme,” Binamulia Hukum 7, no. 2 (2018): 141–42.

Ketut Yasini, “DAMPAK TERORISME TERHADAP INTEGRASI MASYARAKAT MULTIKULTUR DI DESA SAUSU PAKAREME KECAMATAN SAUSU KABUPATEN PARIGI MOUTONG PROVINSI SULAWESI TENGAH,” Widya Genitri : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, Agama Dan Kebudayaan Hindu 8, no. 2 (2017): 41–42, https://doi.org/10.36417/widyagenitri.v8i2.224.

Maslikan Martono and Sapto Priyanto, “Strategi Pencegahan Serangan Terorisme Terhadap Ibu Kota Negara Baru Di Kalimantan Timur,” Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora Dan Politik 5, no. 5 (2025): 4010–23, https://doi.org/10.38035/jihhp.v5i5.4592.

Muhammad- Khamdan, “Pengembangan Bina Damai dalam Penanganan Tindak Pidana Terorisme di Indonesia,” Jurnal Cita Hukum 4, no. 1 (2016): 10–11, https://doi.org/10.15408/jch.v4i1.2835.

Muhammad Syaiful Ibad and Thomas Nugroho Aji, “BOM BALI 2002,” Avatara: Jurnal Pendidikan Sejarah 9, no. 1 (2020): 8–9.

Ni Putu Desi Ariyanti, “Penerapan Asas Non-Retroaktif Dalam Tindak Pidana Terorisme Di Indonesia,” Jurnal Pro Hukum 11, no. 3 (2022): 144, https://doi.org/10.55129/.v11i3.2135.

Raja Zailani, Idham Idham, and Erniyanti Erniyanti, “Analisis Yuridis Proses Penyidikan Tindak Pidana Terorisme Menurut Hukum Di Indonesia: Analisis Teori Hukum Positif Dan Teori Hukum Responsif,” Kajian Ilmiah Hukum Dan Kenegaraan 1, no. 2 (2022): 64–65, https://doi.org/10.35912/kihan.v1i2.1908.

Sokhibul Amin and Feny Windiyastuti, “Deradikalisasi Sebagai Bentuk Pencegahan Tindak Pidana Terorisme Di Indonesia (Studi Kasus Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 4345 K/Pid.Sus/2022),” PESHUM : Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial Dan Humaniora 2, no. 4 (2023): 754, https://doi.org/10.56799/peshum.v2i4.2114.

Maulana Rahmat, Politik Hukum Terhadap Tindak Pidana Terorisme Dalam Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Indonesia, Program Magister Ilmu Hukum Program Pascasarjana Universitas Katolik Parahyangan, 2017, 159.

“Umar Patek bebas bersyarat dan potensi kembalinya aksi teror, penyintas Bom Bali: ‘Luka saya tak akan sembuh tetapi dia sudah bebas,’” BBC News Indonesia, 2022, https://www.bbc.com/indonesia/articles/cp4701vjjgqo.

Dandy Bayu Bramasta and Rendika Ferri Kurniawan, “Perjalanan Umar Patek: Terpidana Bom Bali 1, Sempat Jadi Buronan Seharga 1 Juta Dollar AS, Kini Bebas Bersyarat,” KOMPAS.com, 2022, https://www.kompas.com/tren/read/2022/12/08/170100865/perjalanan-umar-patek--terpidana-bom-bali-1-sempat-jadi-buronan-seharga-1.

Heri Susetyo, “Umar Patek Akhirnya Bebas Bersyarat,” Mediaindonesia.Com, 2022, https://mediaindonesia.com/politik-dan-hukum/542955/umar-patek-akhirnya-bebas-bersyarat.

Kadek Melda Luxiana, “Jejak Umar Patek: Napi Teroris Bom Bali 1, Kini Bebas Bersyarat,” detikNews, News.Detik.Com, 2022, https://news.detik.com/berita/d-6448949/jejak-umar-patek-napi-teroris-bom-bali-1-kini-bebas-bersyarat.

• pdf