PEMBUKTIAN TINDAK PIDANA PENIPUAN SIBER DALAM PERSPEKTIF PASAL 378 KUHP (ANALISIS KASUS POLDA DIY)

Authors
  • Adrian Adrian Padilah

    Author
Keywords:
criminal evidence , penipuan, Pasal 378 KUHP, alat bukti elektronik, cyber crime.
Abstract

The development of information technology has led to a shift in fraud crimes from conventional forms to electronically based fraud. This condition raises legal issues concerning the evidentiary process of fraud offenses as regulated under Article 378 of the Indonesian Criminal Code, which was originally designed for conventional crimes. This study aims to analyze the evidentiary system of fraud offenses under Article 378 of the Criminal Code and to examine the use of electronic evidence in criminal proceedings. This research employs a normative legal research method using statutory and conceptual approaches. The findings indicate that the elements of fraud stipulated in Article 378 of the Criminal Code remain applicable to electronic-based fraud, provided that elements such as deceit or a series of lies can be proven. Electronic evidence has legal standing as valid evidence as long as it complies with the provisions of the Law on Electronic Information and Transactions. However, in judicial practice, evidentiary challenges remain, particularly regarding authentication and evidentiary strength of electronic evidence. Therefore, a comprehensive juridical understanding of digital evidence is required to ensure legal certainty and justice in handling fraud crimes.

References

1. Andika Prayoga Atmaja, N. P. (2022). Tinjauan Hukum Terhadap Penerapan Pasal 378 KUHP Dalam Kasus Kejahatan Penipuan Dikota Medan (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor : 807/Pid.B/2021/PN.Mdn). Medan: Kalam Keadilan.

2. Ardiansyah, T. L. (2024). PENEGAKAN HUKUM TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA PENIPUAN. Yogyakarta: UNIVERSITAS ISLAM INDONESIA.

3. PesmanLaia, H. (2024). Analisis Deskriptif Penerapan Pasal 378 KUHP dalam Dakwaan Kesatu: Studi Kasus Tindak Pidana Penipuan pada Putusan Perkara Nomor 456/Pid.B/2018.PN.Jkt.Pst. EKOMA: Jurnal Ekonomi, Manajemen, Akuntansi Vol.3, No. 2, 997.

4. Priyana, P. (2021). Alat Bukti Informasi Elektronik Tindak Pidana Penipuan Online Dalam Perspektif Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia. Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Volume 9, Issue 1, 186-198.

5. Samsudin, J. (2020). ANALISIS YURIDIS TENTANG PEMBUKTIAN TINDAK PIDANA PENIPUAN SESUAI KETENTUAN PASAL 378 KUHP DIHUBUNGKAN DENGAN ALATALAT BUKTI MEDIA ELEKTRONIKA. Focus. Jurnal Of Law, 14-15.

6. Setyawan, C. N. (2023). Upaya Penyidik Menyelesaikan Tindak Pidana Penipuan. Yogyakarta: Universitas Islam Indonesia.

Cover Image
Downloads
Published
2026-01-08
Section
Articles

How to Cite

PEMBUKTIAN TINDAK PIDANA PENIPUAN SIBER DALAM PERSPEKTIF PASAL 378 KUHP (ANALISIS KASUS POLDA DIY). (2026). Causa: Jurnal Hukum Dan Kewarganegaraan, 16(3), 651-660. https://cibjournal.com/index.php/causa/article/view/5960

Similar Articles

1-10 of 287

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.