Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Articles

Vol. 10 No. 8 (2026): Kohesi: Jurnal Sains dan Teknologi, ISSN 3025-1311

ANOMALY DETECTION: IMPROVING DIGITAL TRANSACTION FRAUD DETECTION WITH A HYBRID MODEL OF ISOLATION FOREST AND LONG SHORT-TERM MEMORY (LSTM)

Submitted
January 7, 2026
Published
2026-01-07

Abstract

Financial transactions in the digital era are increasingly shifting to cashless methods due to their efficiency, but this has actually increased the risk of financial crime. This research aims to develop a more effective anomaly detection model for identifying suspicious transactions in digital transaction systems. This study presents a novel hybrid approach that combines the Isolation Forest Algorithm and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) to identify fraud. Isolation Forest was used to detect transactions that deviate from the normal user profile, while LSTM was used to detect various types of fraud. The results showed that out of 10,000 transaction data, the anomaly detection rate reached approximately 1.87% of the total transactions, with accuracy (100%), precision (99%), recall (100%), and F1-score (100%). The evaluation showed that this model was able to detect suspicious transactions with a very low error rate. The study concluded that this novelty is expected to contribute to the development of more accurate and efficient fraud detection models.

References

  1. [1] Ayan Chatterjee, Bestoun S. Ahmed, “IoT anomaly detection methods and applications: A survey” Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Karlstad University, 651 88 Karlstad, Sweden, Internet of Things 19 (2022) 100568. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iot.2022.100568
  2. [2] Ngoc-Thanh Nguyen, Rogardt Heldal, Patrizio Pelliccione, “Concept-drift-adaptive anomaly detector for marine sensor data streams” Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Norway, Internet of Things 28 (2024) 101414. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iot.2024.101414
  3. [3] Marian Stan, Adriana Dima, Dag Øivind Madsen, Cosmin Dobrin, “Quantifying impact: Bibliometric examination of IoT’s evolution in sustainable development” Bucharest University of Economic Studies, 010374, Bucharest, Romania, Internet of Things 28 (2024) 101370. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iot.2024.101370
  4. [4] Zainab Alwaisi, Tanesh Kumar, Erkki Harjula, Simone Soderi, “Securing constrained IoT systems: A lightweight machine learning approach for anomaly detection and prevention” School of Electrical Engineering, Aalto University, Finland, Internet of Things 28 (2024) 101398. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iot.2024.101398
  5. [5] Mahdi Mnif, Salwa Sahnoun, Yasmine Ben Saad, Ahmed Fakhfakh, Olfa Kanoun, “Combinative model compression approach for enhancing 1D CNN efficiency for EIT-based Hand Gesture Recognition on IoT edge devices” a National School of Electronics and Telecommunications of Sfax, University of Sfax, Tunisia, Internet of Things 28 (2024) 101403. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iot.2024.101403
  6. [6] Nicolas Farabegoli, Danilo Pianini, Roberto Casadei, Mirko Viroli, “Dynamic IoT deployment reconfiguration: A global-level self-organisation approach” Alma Mater Studiorum – University of Bologna, Cesena, Italy, Internet of Things 28 (2024) 101412. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iot.2024.101412

Similar Articles

51-60 of 305

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.