Vol. 25 No. 2 (2026): Musytari: Neraca Manajemen, Akuntasi, dan Ekonomi, ISSN 3025-9495
Articles

ANALISIS PERANAN ADMINISTRASI DIGITAL DALAM MENDUKUNG KEBERLANGSUNGAN UMKM DI RUMAH BUMN JAKARTA

Rika Safitri
Universitas Negeri Jakarta
Henry Eryanto
Universitas Negeri Jakarta
Muhammad Ikhwan
Universitas Negeri Jakarta

Published 2026-01-12

Keywords

  • Digital Administration,
  • MSME Sustainability,
  • Rumah BUMN Jakarta

How to Cite

ANALISIS PERANAN ADMINISTRASI DIGITAL DALAM MENDUKUNG KEBERLANGSUNGAN UMKM DI RUMAH BUMN JAKARTA. (2026). Musytari : Jurnal Manajemen, Akuntansi, Dan Ekonomi, 25(2), 2061-2070. https://cibjournal.com/index.php/musytari/article/view/6241

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze the role of digital administration in supporting the sustainability of Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) fostered by Rumah BUMN Jakarta. Digital administration has become an important aspect of business management as it assists MSME actors in managing business records in a more orderly, systematic, and efficient manner. This study employed a qualitative research design with a case study approach to obtain an in-depth understanding of the implementation of digital administration among MSMEs fostered by Rumah BUMN Jakarta. The units of analysis consisted of the MSME Coordinator of Rumah BUMN Jakarta and MSME actors representing micro, small, and medium business scales. Data were collected through deep interviews and observations. The results indicate that the implementation of digital administration provides benefits in supporting business sustainability, including improved financial recordkeeping, easier transaction monitoring, and more efficient administrative management. However, several challenges were also identified, particularly among micro and small-scale MSMEs, such as limited digital literacy, inadequate supporting devices, age-related factors of business actors, and a lack of consistency in utilizing digital administrative systems. Based on these findings, digital administration plays an important role as a foundation for orderly and professional business management, supports data-driven decision-making, and enhances the readiness of MSMEs to maintain and improve business sustainability.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Basuki, R., Lestari, N., & Andini, F. (2024). Digital audit trail and governance improvement in public sector administration. Journal of Public Management Research, 18(1), 44–59. https://doi.org/10.31002/jpmr.v18i1.2024
  2. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  3. BRIN (Badan Riset dan Inovasi Nasional). (2025). Laporan Riset: Efisiensi Sistem Administrasi Digital dalam Mendukung UMKM di Indonesia. Jakarta: BRIN Press.
  4. Choirunnissa, N. F., & Oktarina, N. (2025). Peran digitalisasi dalam meningkatkan pelayanan administratif kantor. Bookchapter Administrasi Perkantoran, 1. https://doi.org/10.15294/bap.v1i1.278
  5. Creswell, J. W. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
  6. Dewi, M. (2020). Fungsi dan peran administrasi perkantoran modern. Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis dan Manajemen, 5(3), 211–225. https://doi.org/10.31002/jabm.v5i3.2020
  7. Dewi Pradesa, E., Gunawan, Y., & Hapsari, E. (2023). Transformasi digital administrasi pada UMKM: Studi kasus di Kota Bandung. Jurnal Teknologi dan Bisnis Berkelanjutan, 10(4), 201–214. https://doi.org/10.21009/jtbb.v10i4.2023
  8. Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business. Oxford: Capstone.
  9. Fadillah, A. D., & Marsofiyati, M. (2024). Penerapan teknologi digital pada administrasi perkantoran. OPTIMAL: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Manajemen, 4(2), 234–241. https://doi.org/10.55606/optimal.v4i2.3547
  10. Indarti, N., & Langenberg, M. (2004). Factors affecting business success among SMEs: Empirical evidence from Indonesia. Journal of Asian Entrepreneurship and Sustainability, 3(1), 1–17.
  11. Kahveci, T., Gül, S., & Arslan, M. (2025). Digital administrative systems and decision-making efficiency in organizations. Administrative Sciences, 15(2), 120–136. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci15020120
  12. Kurniawan, D., & Pramesti, L. (2023). Standard operating procedures for digital administrative governance in SMEs. Jurnal Administrasi Publik dan Inovasi, 9(3), 66–78. https://doi.org/10.21009/japi.v9i3.2023
  13. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications.
  14. Lukman, F., & Prasetyo, R. (2024). Efficiency and productivity through digital office systems in Indonesia. Jurnal Manajemen dan Inovasi Teknologi, 6(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.47491/jmit.v6i1.2024
  15. Mariyah, D., Hidayat, T., & Ramadhan, E. (2021). Administrative systems and managerial decision-making effectiveness. Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis Indonesia, 9(2), 73–85. https://doi.org/10.21009/jabi.v9i2.2021
  16. Megawaty, R., Putra, A., & Santoso, E. (2021). Penerapan digital library untuk otomatisasi administrasi perpustakaan. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi Informasi, 15(2), 115–128. https://doi.org/10.21009/jpti.v15i2.2021
  17. Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
  18. OECD. (2024). OECD Digital Economy Outlook 2024 (Vol. 2): Strengthening Connectivity, Innovation and Trust. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/3adf705b-en
  19. Rahayu, S., Putra, M., & Halim, A. (2024). Fungsi administrasi dan efektivitas organisasi di era digital. Jurnal Administrasi dan Bisnis, 11(2), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.21009/jab.v11i2.2024
  20. Rahardjo, B. (2023). Modern administrative information systems for public institutions. Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Publik Indonesia, 7(3), 112–128. https://doi.org/10.21009/jiapi.v7i3.2023
  21. Ramadhani, N., Wicaksono, F., & Permata, S. (2024). Building a data-driven culture through digital administration in SMEs. Jurnal Transformasi Digital Indonesia, 5(2), 90–106. https://doi.org/10.21009/jtdi.v5i2.2024
  22. Salsabila, N., Nurhayati, D., & Putra, Y. (2024). Analysis of the effectiveness of the implementation of digitalization in office administration at PT Saka Farma Laboratories Depok Branch. Jurnal Administrasi Perkantoran Modern, 9(1), 21–30. https://doi.org/10.31002/japm.v9i1.2024
  23. Sarito, A. (2023). Digital efficiency in public administration: A case of automation in Southeast Asia. International Journal of E-Government Studies, 16(2), 44–58. https://doi.org/10.31002/ijegs.v16i2.2023
  24. Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
  25. Wulansuci, S., Pratama, R., & Sari, D. (2024). Pelatihan peningkatan kompetensi pedagogik guru di era digital melalui aplikasi SAGURU (Sistem Administrasi Guru). Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Pendidikan, 3(1), 12–20. https://doi.org/10.21009/jpmp.v3i1.2024
  26. Widiyanto, B., & Setiawan, D. (2023). Etika dan privasi dalam pengelolaan data administrasi digital UMKM. Jurnal Keamanan Informasi Indonesia, 5(2), 31–42. https://doi.org/10.21009/jkii.v5i2.2023